Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Facebook Relapse

Like a junkie who's in rehab, or at least publicly trying to quit his drugs, I'm in relapse. Just a day, about twenty-four hours or so since I deactivated my Facebook account, which I recently realized defines and eats all the time when I'm on the Internet--and sometimes even when I'm not.

Start
I was into Facebook wayyy before I had a Friendster account, which I recently deleted, and even before all other people did. I was into Facebook back when the interface (is that the proper term for the 'look' of a webpage? hah, I don't know.) was fugly; the font small; and the features minimal. I remember having only two friends: Teppie Abella, who introduced me to it, and Amaris Javillonar. We just wrote funny stuff on each other's Walls (which was wayyy worse than what it looks like now) and poke each other, and then log out. There's nothing much really.

Hooked
I got hooked when people started getting into Facebook and suddenly, before I knew it, almost everyone is on Facebook, and I had 600+ friends. It's like a big international civil registry. The only difference is, not all the information (and even the people) are true/real. You just have to pick which ones to believe, and which ones to take as lies/fake, which friends to "add as friend" (and give access to almost everything about you) and which ones to "add later" (I remember this option used to say, quite outrightly I believe, "Ignore."). Also, there were a lot of stuff to do, other than looking at people's profiles and photos (without leaving a virtual mark that you have viewed such), like make notes, tag people in photos, play games and post links (which became my past time haha).

I could spend all day logged in on Facebook. Yeah, I was that addicted. If I nothing substantial to do, like check and reply to notifications, I would think of some random friend I had and just go to his profile and check/view where he/she has been or what he/she been up to lately. In other words, stalking.

According to a TIME article on addiction, and I quote in full: "Addictions," says Joseph Frascella, director of the division of clinical neuroscience at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), "are repetitive behaviors in the face of negative consequences, the desire to continue something you know is bad for you."


The Realization
The idea to deactivate my Facebook account--because I was not (wo)man enough to quit the thing altogether--came at a time when I'm in (currently at that, hehe) a very stressful situation called: Finals Week. Finals week, the week where almost all your profs in all your subjects give out final exams to end the semester, a measure to what you've learned and retained from all the discussions, readings etc. In undergrad, finals week wasn't a stressful or dreadful experience for I always aimed for exemption from final exams, or some profs opted not to give final exams. But apparently, in law school, the words "finals week" mean business. Everyone gives out final exams, and no one gives out exemptions. Yeah, as if someone can be exempted by their sheer semester-long brilliance. Anyway, I realized that the time I wasted on Facebook would be better spent studying a.k.a. trying to pass. So I went to the computer, logged in, and deactivated--but not after replying/checking the notifications, as if it would matter later, haha.

But I have to admit, this deactivation is temporary. I plan to reactivate my account as soon my finals week is over. Or maybe, I'd extend the deactivation longer. Who knows?

The Morning After, literally
I still think about Facebook. This blog as a proof and manifestation of that thought. As a way to put myself away from the temptation of reactivating my account, I decided to not go online at all. But this morning, I had to check my email for some writing "assignment" to do for a job application process. When I saw that the "assignment" hadn't been sent yet, I thought of reactivating my Facebook account to pass time. This is called the Withdrawal phase, I believe.

This is what I did: take a deep breath, count to ten, and walk away from the computer. Don't ever get online while having these "fits" because temptation would be strongest. Imagine, you'll be a click away from reactivating your addicting lifestyle. Remind yourself the reasons why you deactivated (or for the "braver" ones out there, quitted). It's all in the mind. But if you do need to go online, think of doing other things... like blogging, which I admit, had been relegated to the backseat with Facebook in the front seat of the car I call, my Internet life.

I know, and expect, many more What-If-Reactivate Moments will come within the week (around Oct12 to Oct 19 or maybe longer) I decide to deactivate it. I'd like to think I'm prepared or well-distracted to not notice the difference. But when the strongest impulse to reactivate comes, I just have to remind myself which "thing" I value most: real life experiences/acquaintances (or even failures, if I flunk my exams) or virtual connection.


-------------------
PS: To deactivate your Facebook account, do this:
Log in to Facebook, hover your mouse pointer over the "Settings" tab, click "Account Settings" from the drop-down menu, tick off the reason/s why you're leaving, and then provide your password. Confirm and voila! you're off Facebook as easy (and as quickly, too) as you made your account. Good luck.
I'll write about how to delete one's Facebook account when I have convinced myself to do so.



.

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Where the other half is, I don't know.

You know why I love music?

Music not only gives life to life; it elicits/provokes thoughts and expressions that are otherwise forgotten or ignored. That's one of the many reasons why I love it. Tonight, I write about John Mayer's recent single--well, the most recent one I know of.

The thing with John Mayer is this: I always remember him as the guy who sang No Such Thing, the song my crush, when that person wasn't my crush yet, sang in class that one time when we were all asked to sing whatever song we wanted. (fyi: I sang Sara Bareilles' One Sweet Love. haha) That became such an epic moment for me. It's like one of those seemingly simple and uneventful moments in your life that stick to your mind, to your memory, like glue. Unforgettable, defining. And for that, I'll never forget Mr. Mayer.

Tonight, after seeing and listening to Mayer's new video, the link to which was posted by a friend on Facebook, Half of my Heart, my mind went "Aha!" It's like John Mayer (and his co-writer/s, if he ever has one) wrote that song with my mind in mind. Yeah, it was that accurate.

Anyway. I refuse to go on further with this, because honestly I'd prefer to keep this locked up in my own Pandora's box of what-could-bes and what-might-have-beens. But like any other sentimental person, it's fun and... I don't know, relieving to let yourself get nostalgic once in awhile... to remind myself--and write about it--of this too blissful moment in my short twenty-year life. A legendary moment. ;)

Half of my heart's got a grip on the situation.
Half of my heart takes time
Half of my heart's got a right mind...
Half of my heart's got a good imagination, 
Half of my heart's got you.


And half of my heart is the part of a man
who's never truly loved anything. 


Then you come on crashing in like the realest thing. 


.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Let the first be the last.

Later tonight, our block will be having our last official class for the first semester of AY 2010-2011. Coincidentally, our first class this semester is also the last, which makes the journey, I guess, complete. Full-circle, as they say.

To be happy about this simple triumph (finishing my first semester in law school alive and with most of my values and dignity intact), I fear, would/may jinx my grades. It may be a baseless fear for my grades are already low or not-so-great as they are. Jinx or no jinx. But then again, I take this time, my sweet time to be thankful to all the forces of nature, luck and faith that has brought me where I am--hours away from my last class.

Of course, I'm not counting out the fact/chance of me being butchered by my professor later tonight during recitation. But as it is, I'm happy at what I've accomplished--albeit inchoate, haha. The passing grades (regardless of how barely passing they are) I will be getting (hopefully), in all five of my subjects this semester, will make this happiness complete, and the relief genuine

Goodluck to me and all others who'll be taking final exams these coming weeks. May we all make it alive and  able next semester, and all the others after that! :)


.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Death on a Sunday



death: painful and sad
avoid it, that's what we do
acceptance: have to




.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Lawyered!: Do the Math

This series will cover topics involving the law, law school and everything in between told from the perspective of a frightened, enlightened, irritated, and engaged law student. :)


I scanned the weekened papers for a possible engaging topic/news that relates to law, and I can comment/react on squarely. Of course, I could've picked a number of news items since almost anything on the news are law-related, but I wouldn't do that concept/that news justice if I didn't pick it very wisely. So for this week, I pick... party-list representatives.

According to Mr. J Bondoc's article in The Philippine Star: "Pending in the Comelec is a petition of the only 11 sectoral parties that got more than 2 percent of the votes for party-list last May. They rightly contend that since they had met the basic requirement for party-list voting, then their three nominees each should be proclaimed congressmen. But the Comelec has shelved the petition. It will rule only after the special elections in November in three provinces where the balloting failed last time, affecting about 500,000 votes. So the House of Representatives will lack 11 members till then..... Last May only one party got 6 percent. The Comelec proclaimed its three nominees forthwith. Eleven others got more than 2 percent, and were given two seats each. Something odd followed. The Comelec proclaimed 16 other reps from parties that did not even get 1 or 2 percent. Penultimate of the 16 was Mikey Arroyo, of Ang Galing Pinoy. Incidentally, all the seven Comelec commissioners are appointees of Mikey’s mom, former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo." (emphasis mine)

I guess the main issue here is: whether or not Ang Galing Pinoy and the 15 other party-list representatives who got less than 2% of votes are entitled to a seat each despite the existence of other party-list groups who got more than 2% of the votes but were only awarded 2 seats.

To clarify, I'm not claiming that I am an "expert" on this matter but if I tried to answer the question using what we had discussed in Constitutional Law 1, my answer would be this:

Let us revisit the Supreme Court's ruling regarding this matter in the case of Banat vs. COMELEC (2009). In Banat, the Court provided for the procedure of the allocation of party-list seats, as follows:

1. Compute the seats to be allocated to the party-list representatives, taking into consideration the requirement in Section 5(2) of Article VI of the Constitution. Thus, the number of seats available to legislative districts is divided by .80 and multiplied by .20 to get the number of seats available to party-list representatives.

2. Rank every party-list according to the number of votes they got in the elections, from highest to lowest. Divide the total number of votes of each party-list by the total number of votes cast for the party-list system. This is the percentage we will be basing from now on.

3. In the "first-round" of allocation of seats, allot one seat each to every party-list that garnered 2% or higher.

4. In the "second-round" of allocation, the percentage is multiplied by the remaining available seats (total seats minus the allocated seat in the first round). The whole integer of the said product corresponds to a party’s share in the remaining available seats. Assign one party-list seat to each of the parties next in rank until all available seats are completely distributed.

5. Finally, we apply the three-seat cap to determine the number of seats each qualified party-list candidate is entitled.

Using this formula, it is clear that it is legally/mathematically possible for Ang Galing Pinoy and the 15 others who got less than 2% of the party-list votes to be entitled to a seat each because the two-percent cap applies only in the first-round of allocation. If you get 2% or higher, you automatically get one seat in the House. You may be entitled to more but that depends on the computation in the second round. If, in the second round, you get an integer of 1.5 or 1.-something it will still be considered as one seat. Thus, the remaining seats after the second round are distibuted to the parties (according to rank, regardless of the 2% threshold) until everything has been allotted.
 
I hate to be mathematical when explaining the logic of things because: 1) it sounds impersonal and, to some extent, boring, and 2) I hate Math. But just like Marshall, who explains and proves his points using well-prepared graphs (see photo), I guess I have to get used to it. I find people accepting more readily one's explanation/s when it is supported by mathematical computations, statistics and empirical results as compared to an explanation backed by social theories, and socially-proven facts. Hmmm.  
 
Anyway, let us put this entry to an end with:
 
Lawyered!



.

Lawyered!: The Law-down

Since I've been blogging--here and in my Multiply account--for about four years now, I guess it's time for me to bring structure to what I love doing. Yes, some may say structuring will make it boring but I promise to make it less so. Why structure? Because it's better and easier for the readers to look at entries in a perspective, in a sequence or in a category. My first experiment with structure in my blog was introducing the "Saturday Soliloquy" series, which was fun and informative but since I have Saturday classes and have reading a lot lately, I thought of introducing a new one.

Marshall + law school = Eagerness
Since I'm law school, for four months already--and possibly a lot more years to come, if I manage, hehe--I realize it is best to combine the things I love doing and will be doing... just because.

I named this series "Lawyered!" after my-favorite-lawyer-on-TV Marshall Eriksen's famous catchphrase in the show How I Met Your Mother. It's his version of Barney's "Legen-wait for it-dary!" This series will cover topics involving the law, law school and everything in between told from the perspective of a frightened, enlightened, irritated, and engaged law student. :)

So to start... let me answer the frequently asked question: Kamusta naman ang UP Law? (How is UP Law?)

My answer would simply be, UP Law is EPIC.

Extremely frightening. People weren't joking nor exaggerating when they said/warned me (and the two thousand-plus applicants to the 2009 LAE) that UP Law is out of the ordinary. It is home to the country's best lawyers, law students, and of course, the best professors. A "perfect" set-up for learning what is the law etc. Of course there is a catch. These professors, albeit being really good, pushes their students to learn more, and give better effort to become better lawyers, in a different way. Recitation, or recit as we fondly/dreadfully call it, never sounded this dreadful to me. Four months in, and I still hold my breath while the professor shuffles the recitation cards, picks out a card, and calls out the name of the "lucky" one, who will stand for recit for at least 10 or fifteen minutes. Usually, we stand to recite for a lot longer than that. But as early as now, I can say this, I learn better with fear. ;)

Profoundly enlightening. After all the shock and appall, and after one has gotten used to all that fear and dread, comes the better part--the learning. Being in the receiving end of the best law professors' lectures and discussions, I'm fortunate to be learning these things regarding the law and how to be better at it. Truly, my undergrad professor was right when he said, "other law schools teach you to pass the bar; UP Law teaches you how to become a lawyer."

Irritating. No matter how much I loved reading, and how better I am at speed reading, I've never read this much before. And sometimes, it is irritating. It is irritating/frustrating when you get called for recit and failed to answer your prof's questions despite reading the case/s inside out. It is irritating when you called to recite for that one case you failed to read. It is irritating when you've read everything but your prof, after answering his/her question, would accuse you of reading off/getting answers from someone else's digest. Whenever I'm irritated by law school's nuances and hang-ups, I think about the positives, and then I forget temporarily--but just enough time for me to disregard of the thought of leaving.

Completely engaging. Law and law school engages me in all aspects. It brings out my happiest, saddest, crappiest, and angriest emotions. It brings out the best, the worst and the mediocre in me. It brings out who I really am, what I want in/from life, what I value the most/the least, where I want to be at a certain time, what my goals are and how I plan to meet these goals.

Lawyered!



.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Now, it's official: I'm bitter

I'm too depressed with the loss of Hugh Laurie and Neil Patrick Harris to react. Here are the winners of the 62nd Emmy Awards:


Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy — Eric Stonestreet, Modern Family

Outstanding Writing in a Comedy — Modern Family

Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy — Jane Lynch, Glee

Outstanding Directing in a Comedy — GLEE

Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy — Jim Parsons, The Big Bang Theory

Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy — Edie Falco, Nurse Jackie

Outstanding Reality-Competition Program — Top Chef

Outstanding Writing for a Drama — Mad Men

Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama — Aaron Paul, Breaking Bad

Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama — Archie Panjabi, The Good Wife

Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama — Brian Cranston, Breaking Bad

Outstanding Directing in a Drama — Dexter

Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama — Kyra Sedgwick, The Closer

Outstanding Writing in Variety — 63rd Annual Tony Awards

Outstanding Variety Series — The Daily Show With Jon Stewart

Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Miniseries or Movie — Julia Ormond, Temple Grandin

Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Miniseries or Movie — David Strathairn, Temple Grandin

Outstanding Writing in a Miniseries or Movie — You Don’t Know Jack

Outstanding Lead Actress in a Miniseries or Movie — Claire Danes, Temple Grandin

Outstanding Directing in a Miniseries or Movie — Temple Grandin

Outstanding Lead Actor in a Miniseries or Movie — Al Pacino, You Don’t Know Jack

Outstanding Miniseries — The Pacific

Outstanding Made for Television Movie — Temple Grandin

Outstanding Drama Series — Mad Men

Outstanding Comedy Series — Modern Family

Monday, August 23, 2010

Before Things Get More Bitter

Last year, I waited 'til the announcement of winners before I wrote my 61st Emmy blog entry, thinking that my favorites like The Big Bang Theory, How I Met Your Mother and House would win in their respective categories--but they didn't. It turned out to be an ampalaya entry, if you know what I mean.

Before the rest of the winners of this year's Emmys will be announced on the 29th of August (the winners in other categories have been announced; except for the "big" ones), here's my take on the nominees, and who I think should win--as if my opinion matters at all, and before this whole thing becomes moot and academic. Hehe


Outstanding lead actor in a comedy series
Jim Parsons (The Big Bang Theory) should outrightly win this thing this time. Please Emmys, Alec Baldwin (30 Rock) won over Sheldon last year, don't make the same mistake again this year. It would've been nice if Zachary Levi was nominated for Chuck but I guess the show's not that Emmy-worthy(?) yet. I predict that the year Chuck gets nominated will be the same year Zac Levi, Joshua Gomez or even Adam Baldwin will be nominated as well.

Outstanding lead actress in a comedy series
Since Kaley Cuoco (The Big Bang Theory) was snubbed this year, I'm rooting for Tina Fey (30 Rock) who lost to Toni Collette (United States of Tara), who's not in this year's list, last year. Go Tina!

Outstanding lead actor in a drama series
Hugh Laurie (House) lost last year to Cranston (Breaking Bad)--also a nominee this year--so I expect the Emmys to give this year's trophy to the much-deserving Laurie for the season premiere of House last season (Season 6), which I heard was what he submitted for judging.

Outstanding lead actress in a drama series
I'm not familiar with any of the actresses nominated in this category, nor the shows they were nominated for. It's either I don't watch that much high-end drama or the ones I watch are snubbed or are not Emmy-worthy. Cases in point: The women of Desperate Housewives, a series which I decided to stop following religiously for the simple reason that I got bored somewhere along the way, and Lisa Edelstein of House. Maybe next year, Cuddy.

Outstanding comedy series
How could How I Met Your Mother not be nominated this year?! The doppelgangers were funny. The Playbook was funny. The SlapBet is still funny. And how could the guys at Emmys not find The Sexless Innkeeper skit not funny?!? Or the "not good enough" *plus whipping sound* by Marshall. Oh boy. This is the major snub of the year!

And for the third straight year, The Big Bang Theory is snubbed yet again. Okay, maybe I skipped on finishing the rest of Season 3 but hey, I just had to prioritize my time. The show is still funny--regardless if I'm watching it or not.

Chuck was also snubbed. Again, I predict that the year Chuck gets nominated, Zac Levi, Joshua Gomez or even Adam Baldwin will be nominated as well. So let's all wait for that. Season 4, maybe?
Considering these snubs, which breaks my heart beyond words, I vote for 30 Rock, since it has been winning the past couple of years--or maybe Glee, with its freshman luck, can snatch it.

Outstanding drama series
How could House not be nominated this year?! Is the Chase-killing-a-patient-which-leads-to-Cameron-leaving storyline not enough drama?! And really, LOST?! 'Nuff said. Seriously, is my taste completely the opposite of the Emmys? I predict--no, I wish for--a Dexter win. Just to spite perennial winner, Mad Men.

Oustanding supporting actor in a comedy series
Last year, Jon Cryer (Two and a Half Men) beat out HIMYM's Neil Patrick Harris, and I would think that this year it would just be downright absurd if NPH will lose to the same man for the second straight year. But Chris Colfer (Glee) is maybe--just maybe--headed for big upset this year. May the better man win. ;)
I'm sure Glee fans are raving about this nomination--maybe more than the Lea Michele nomination for Outstanding actress in a comedy or the Matthew Morrisson nomination for oustanding lead actor in a comedy--just because Colfer has greater chances of winning than Michele and Matthew.

Oustanding supporting actress in a comedy series
I predict Jane Lynch (Glee) winning this over everyone else, hands down. Sue is like the girl-Barney (only in a meaner, not too sex-driven way). They're both very effective "villains with good qualities" or "protagonists with off-beat qualities."

Oustanding supporting actor in a drama series
I guess I don't watch much drama except for House, and Wilson, Chase and Foreman and even Taub failed to make the cut. I wonder if Kutner would've had a better chance in getting nominated if he lived.

Oustanding supporting actress in a drama series
It turns out Burn Notice is a drama series! Sharon Gless for the win! No one can play Michael Westen's "cool" mom better than Gless.

So there you go. My predictions. But if I may add my own category...

Perennial Snub Award
One last thing though, in the list of this year's nominees and last year's, I wonder... where the hell is BONES? Yes, Chuck and The Big Bang Theory, equally great shows, were absent in the past two years and that's understandable considering they were on for four and three seasons, respectively, but Bones has been airing for five seasons already! Isn't that enough for a nomination? Or people at the Emmys are having a hard time classfying what the show is... is it a comedy, or is it drama? I'd go for drama though. Or Bones just don't have what it takes, which is complete B.S.

IT OBVIOUSLY HAS WHAT IT TAKES. They're just not looking hard enough. The Eric Millegan-Emily Deschanel (as Zack Addy and Dr. Temperance Brennan, respectively) scene in the Gormogon episode, which was also a season finale a season ago, was certainly worth something. Too bad it wasn't recognized, as with the other Bones episodes.



------------
Good thing, in the 32nd Daytime Emmy Awards, The Ellen DeGeneres Show won over last year's winner Rachael Ray for Outstanding entertainment talk show. Good. One win down, more to go. :)

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Lucky 13th?

Fearless Forecast on
PBA's Fiesta Conference Finals 2010


To make this short and straight to the point (because I still have to read up on Bernas' Consti haha), I predict this Finals series to be won by the Aces if it goes the distance or by the Beermen if it only goes until five. The shorter the series, the more it will favor the Beermen. The longer it goes, the higher chances of Alaska snatching their 13th championship.


ACES in SEVEN
The Aces have the following factors going for them:

Character. This season alone, the Aces have won Game5 against crowd favorite Ginebra in the Quaterfinals and Game7 against league-leader Talk N' Text in the Semis. And they managed to do these amazing feats without Willier Miller in their roster. This goes to show what the team is made of. From LA Tenorio to Larry Fonacier to Jeffrey Cariaso to Reynel Hugnatan to Tony  Dela Cruz--these players are winners, and come clutch time they will surely step up to the plate to deliver the points and composure when it matters the most. It's not always about skill. It's all about heart.

Coach Tim Cone. Being the second winningest coach in PBA history (Baby Dalupan being the winningest) tells a lot about Tim Cone's reliable system. He has guided the Aces to a Grand Slam in the '90s with Abarrientos, Lastismosa and Cariaso. And this season, he managed to steer the Aces to the Finals despite the very worthy adversaries in Ginebra and Talk N Text, the absence of Miller and the presence of underrated players. He alone could spell the difference for the Aces.

Chemistry. Except for Cyrus Baguio and Diamon Simpson, most of the Aces have been playing together for around three years already. They have learned and mastered Coach Tim Cone's triangle offense, which, as we have seen in Phil Jackson's system with the Lakers, can be deadly. DeVance and Thoss have blossomed into the big men the team trained them to be--good passers, steady shooters and good post defenders. Along with Simpson, these big men remain to be key points in the Aces' traingle offense. 

Defense. I believe the Aces is the second best defensive team in the league this season--with Derby Ace ranking first. They play a very solid team defense that the Beermen obviously lack. As the basketball cliche goes, Offense wins games; defense wins championships. 

With all these said, the Aces still has weaknesses to work on/worry about. Fatigue may become a factor in a seven-game series. Alaska have been playing games non-stop since the quarterfinals. The stamina of the players, and even the coaches, will be put to the test as the series gets longer. Along with fatigue are the injuries. Two vital players in the Alaska rotation were injured in the Game7 win over TNT last Wednesday--Sonny Thoss stepped on someone's foot while Tony Dela Cruz got a elbow on the throat. If these players miss the entire series, the scales would certainly favor the Beermen, as the Aces obviously lack the deep bench SMB has. But knowing Coach Tim Cone and his system, he will find ways to remedy these weaknesses. I foresee Fonacier, Mark Borboran and Joe DeVance having break out games in the series.


BEERMEN in FIVE
Although I outrightly go for the Aces in this series, I foresee the possibility of the Beermen snatching the championship because of these factors:

Talent. Arguably, the Beermen is one of the most talented teams, if not the most talented, this season. With a prolific import in Gabe Freeman, who also played last Fiesta Conference, a steady bunch of veterans in Hontiveros, Racela, Siegle, Pena and Ildefonso, talented acquisitions in Santos, Cabagnot, Yeo and Miranda, the vast improvement of Washington, and a deep bench that boasts of Villanueva, Pennisi and Tugade (who could easily be a starter in another team), the Beermen look poised to win the championship. At least, on paper. If the Aces lax on defense, expect the Beermen to go on a scoring rampage.

Bench. As I have pointed out, the Beermen has a very deep bench. Just imagine Coach Siot Tanquincen having the luxury of pulling Danny Siegle and Lordy Tugade from the bench at any juncture in the game. Almost all of the players have had championship experience, too--albeit in different teams. Yeo and Miranda have won one with the Realtors. Hontiveros, Ildefonso, Siegle, Racela and Pena have won numerous titles with SMB.

I see two things the Beermen has to work on to improve their chances of winning the championship. First is team chemistry. Although, individually, the players are talented, basketball is still a team sport. It takes five players on court to make things work. The recent acquisitions of Cabagnot, Yeo, Miranda and Santos and evenTugade during the off-season may become a factor for the Beermen. Second is foul trouble. The Beermen, as I've seen in their past few games, have a penchant for getting into foul trouble very early in the game; or into penalty very early in the quarter. Freeman and Pena have to manage their fouls well considering how good ballhandlers/inside players Fonacier, Tenorio and DeVance are. 

And lastly, the Beermen needs to have the heart to go for the win. Yes, the players are all well-established in their own rights (I believe they have won most of the individual awards this Conference). Somehow Coach Siot has to find the proper motivation for the team to have the desire to win the championship.


As with any forecast, these predictions are not cast in stone. Some of them may be wrong, some may be right. But one thing I'm sure of is that this championship (PBA's 100th) will be wayyy more worth watching than last Conference's.


=======================
sidenote:
Matchups to watch out for are:
LA Tenorio v. Olsen Racela/Alex Cabagnot/Jonas Villanueva/Dennis Miranda
Larry Fonacier v. Joseph Yeo
Gabe Freeman v. Diamon Simpson
Joe DeVance/Tony Dela Cruz v. Arwind Santos/Jay Washington






Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Failure on a Wednesday

After having a nice afternoon merienda/dinner with Janjan and Pau in MoMo at Eastwood, and almost two hours in public transpo trying to get home after buying the last copy (which was a little dirty) of Bernas' Consti 1 book in Recto (from Morayta I had to go to Sm North and take a taxi back to VLuna?! My public transpo skills are failing me. :/) I check my email and find out about the bad news. 

Ye-ahhh. (a la Barney)

In a nutshell (hahaha someone said this to me sarcastically a couple of days ago and I couldn't remember who! Is my memory is failing me as well? :/), after a series of tests, interviews and filling out a couple personal employee data sheets, I was turned down by the first company I ever applied for. Epic fail :/

But I couldn't say it entirely surprised me. I knew right after the interview that I wouldn't make it. Judging by the time the whole final interview took (which was surprisingly under twenty minutes), and how the interviewers kept reiterating the fact that law school was going to interfere with the supposed work schedule. 

But still... when something is told to you in black and white, although you see it coming, you still feel bad about it. I guess it has something to do with, in my case, failing at something--and then having that failure rubbed in my face by someone/something. Because no matter how hard I deny it, I am competitive. I like winning, and I give my best effort to get that victory. And in cases that I don't, it bums me. 

Ohwell. 

To be positive about it, at least I won't be put into a position where I will or might compromise my law studies, which is the most important thing to me right now. I guess I have to wait for that RTC gig (the most suitable job for me)--whenever that may be. :)

At least this didn't happen on a Saturday. Seeing Janjan and Pau--who had the juicest story of the day haha--almost made up for today's semi-epic fail. 


.


Saturday, July 31, 2010

Our Own Fiero

My father's newly restored Volkswagen car



When I was a kid, I used to dream of/plan to graduate from college and be a lawyer (thinking four years was enough for this) and have a car. For me, a car showed that the person who owned it was of fairly-okay status (in Filipino, mas nakakaangat sa buhay). 


A view that I shared with most Pinoys. A view that, I will not lie, I still maintain up to now. (I'm capitalist like this! haha)


So while I'm waiting for the free time to be able to learn how to drive, and for the job that will give me enough money for gas and repairs of the restored Volkswagen (see photo) my father promised to hand down to me come law school, I have to be content with experiencing fun and whatnots in others people's cars... in Janelle's car Cupcake in particular.


The Car
Janjan's car, Cupcake, is my most favorite car ever! 


The Driver
Back in fourth year college, Janelle, who I lovingly call 'Janjan', drove all the way to UP Manila (where I study) from UP Diliman (where she studies) to bring me, of all things, a "healthy breakfast." It was one of those random/crazy ideas we said aloud and laughed about but never expected to actually happen. What made it more special was that she had to overcome her apprehension of driving in the streets of Manila for that idea to happen. 


Since she had an exam in the afternoon of the same day, she had to leave as soon as I finished eating the breakfast. Out of the blue--maybe, the feeling of randomness was in the air, haha--I suggested to ride with her back to UP Diliman. I remember saying that the drive was too long to be made alone--as if she was the first person to make such drive alone. The drive was unexpectedly fun, and revealing. I got to see a different side--I admit, a side I liked--of Janelle, the driver side. Slow, careful and observant. Much like how she is in life, perhaps. And funny. All throughout the drive, she kept saying things I found completely hilarious. Like when she said that I'd ace the exam I was preparing for just because I was good at memorization. I berated her for weeks about that Freudian slip but it was all good. ;-)


The Seat
For me, contrary to what my friends Rich and Jecy said, the so-called 'place of honor' in the car is the passenger seat or 'the second frontseat.' As much as possible and as much as the circumstance permits it, I occupy that seat when in a car. I find it... empowering. And of course, seeing all the driving, in almost the same viewpoint as the driver's, makes me feel like the driver. 


The "Scenery"
There was one time when we were on our way to Technohub or Philcoa, I remember seeing flags along Commonwealth Ave., and commented, "Ano ba yan bakit may flag ng Mexico dito?" I'm not sure if it was Harold or Pauie, in the backseat, who informed me, "Sa Iglesia Ni Cristo 'yan hindi Mexico." It turned out they were celebrating their foundation anniversary, and Janjan and her family are members of INC. Dyahe. It was so embarrassing and funny at the same time. 


Another instance was, during one of my "UPD visits" before I took the LAE, Janjan, Pauie and I were driving around UP Campus, and we passed by this house on a corner, and I randomly said, "Diyan ako magdo-dorm." We just laughed at my comment then, because I was not-so confident in passing the exam and making it to UP Law. But now, after I successfully passed the LAE, when I pass by that house on the corner, I realize how Nostradamus-like that moment was. Making it one of the most epic car rides ever.


The Feeling
One of the most touching, if not sentimental, car ride we had was one of the more recent ones. After one of my UPD visits, she was about to drop me off at Philcoa, like always, when out of the blue--literally, out of her bag--she handed me this yellow Cirque du Soleil band she got for me when she went to Macau. She knew that my ICanServe awareness band had snapped, and thus provided a new one.  I didn't know she made a mental note that my favorite band had snapped and I couldn't get a replacement for it. To be honest, that CdS band was one of my most, if not the most, favorite pasalubong I got. :)


All these, and other stories and experiences happened--thanks to Cupcake.


If Marshall and the gang of How I Met Your Mother had the Fiero to define, maintain and deepen their friendships and relationships, Janelle, Pauie, and me (and sometimes Harold, too) have Cupcake.




.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Hello, Death

I'm not good with goodbyes the same way I'm not good with hellos and first meetings.

When dealing with goodbyes--from the usual parting of ways after a class or the more emotional parting of ways for a long period of time--I either walk away without any hint or drama or I raise a hand in a semi-wave and utter a simple, "Bye." In moments when I'm feeling friendly I add, "Ingat"---but believe me those moments are rare.

Case 1. Saying goodbye to my all-time favorite teacher, my high school Algeb teacher Ms Ramos. With her, Math wasn't so confusing. I remember I sort of self-dedicated the song "Hands to Heaven" to her. We were too mushy that we exchanged hankies on her surprising (because she had to leave our school to teach in another school, mid-school year) last day in school, as if that was enough to keep our bond. Well maybe it was.
That was in third year.
Sadly, I was not able to maintain communication with her as much as I keep the hanky up to now. :/

Case 2. Saying goodbye to a dear friend. Our friendship, no matter how I hard I tried to keep it from sinking or whatever, was reduced to a goodbye hug in front of KFC-Taft/Faura at about 11pm. It was surreal, like in a movie. But the pain, the sadness, the regret was always as real as real can be. Sometimes, you gotta do what you gotta do.

Case 3. Saying goodbye to our decade-old dog, Lupin. I'm not much of a pet/animal person but I was saddened, more than I expected, when I found out that he was already dead when I came home after two weeks of not doing so because of the gazillion stuff I had to read for law school. And what makes it sadder was that I was unable to see him before he passed away, as if me seeing him would change the fact that he's dead now.


I guess all the sadness I have equated with saying goodbye, whether temporary or permanent, manifests in: 1) my choice not to look into dead people's caskets, and seeing their faces. I choose to remember people the liveliest way I can rather than their latest  "look" before they passed away; 2) my penchant to avoid hospitals--either being confined in one or visiting a loved one; 3) my constant efforts to avoid wakes and funerals, the last wake and funeral I attended wholeheartedly because I was really close to the deceased was my Tita's--and that was when I was around eight or nine years old; and 4) my super conscious effort to stay away from horror films. I vowed Kris Aquino's Feng Shui to be my last.

As the saying goes, The only things that are constant in this world are death and taxes. And since I have yet to become a taxpayer--I'm sort of not looking forward to that--I guess I have to learn to grapple or deal with death, or goodbyes, for it is here to stay.... even longer after I have left.



.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

'Type' Kita

One of my lesser (but in the end, will be one of the greater) concerns regarding law school life is the handwriting part. I have (or I'd like to think that I do have) substance in writing but I lack the form part. I may have bright and not-so bright ideas but sometimes I have a difficulty conveying them without the use of technology.

Example: I have lots of things going on in my head; lots of opinions on everything... well, basically, I have a lot to say but I have a difficulty conveying these ideas through public speaking. Being an Org president and law student, people readily (and quite wrongly) assume that I take public speaking with ease. No I don't. Second to performing in front of many people, this is one of my greatest fears. I find it relatively easier to write down my thoughts rather than actually speak them.

But, here's the problem... the writing part is actually typing. In order for me to be able to convey successfully my thoughts and ideas to other people--which, for me, is the main point of communication--I have to use technology. Thus, I type relatively well compared to most people. I type better than I write. :)

You see, I'm one of those gifted people who draws and does lettering wayyy better than writing. My brother Jay and I blame our faulty handwriting to not being strictly-taught by our father, who taught ate Jane who has one of the clearest handwriting in the world, and to being taught to write by a pre-school named "Quick Learners." Haha, quick indeed.

My nearly indiscernible Morse Code-like handwriting was one of the reasons why I thought of entering Med school instead of law school. People kept saying, "Ang pangit naman ng sulat mo, pang-doktor." Doctors, as I was told, had an excuse for having a not-so legible handwriting because the burden of proof, haha, of understanding their handwriting lie on the pharmacists who read the prescriptions they wrote. They weren't forced to try to have a more legible handwriting.

In contrast, law school is all about writing. That exams are handwritten, that some profs prefer handwritten case digests, that the bar exam is all about four Sundays of writing legibly, and as I learn through the Leg Big homework earlier this week, that even homeworks are handwritten. Oops.

To be honest, I was surprised, and to a point relieved, to find out that I was not the only one, in our block at least, to have the scrappiest handwriting but others had the handwriting thing going for them. And I mean, really. They were like lean-mean breathing handwriting machines.

Here are a couple of photos of the handwriting of my blockmates...

Kirby's


Richard's

and mine...

Although I was not alone in having a not-so legible handwriting, I realized, sadly, that mine was one of the most indiscernible ones.

Hayyy. Another area to improve. And I'm not even concerned about passing the bar exams, I'm thinking about passing my exams this semester.

---------------------------------------------
Sana pwedeng i-type na lang ang sagot sa exams. :/

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Food for thought

Great things may break us; the smallest things glue us back together.






.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

The Old Has Gone; The New Has Come

With every old thing thrown away, I believe there is something new to gain. Either its a renewed hope, renewed fear, or something as tangible as a new band.

Almost a couple of years back, I started wearing this ICanServe awareness band--much like a baller ID--for the advocacy to battle breast cancer and well, it also stood for another, more personal reason. Before Graduation last April 2010, that band snapped. It was the second of the same design already; for the first snapped while I was in Batanes. I took it as a sign--a goodbye sign of sorts. All things I did, and happened to me while in Undergrad (funny, painful and downright interesting), I realized, as that band snapped, should be chalked up to experience--and not something I have/should to dwell on no matter how memorable and how unique they are.

So, as melodramatic as it may sound--and believe me I rarely get this dramatic--I chalked up everything to experience. Life lessons, as they say.

Come law school, though, I didn't see it coming. I didn't see myself acquiring another band. I didn't foresee that that something that I was gaining in replacement of the other would be as tangible/as literal as this. Yes, the Universe have conspired to let me have one--for without one, I feel empty. My left wrist, aside from the occasional watch I wear to class, is left bare.

But this one, this particular band has an altogether different meaning. The difference between the band of then and now are these:

1. This New one was given by a friend who went to Macau for summer; I bought the other one from PinkRibbon.

2. This New one was a harmony of pastel colors--a sign of brighter things ahead, maybe?--while the Old one was black with the occasional pink and white letters.

3. The Old one stood for deeper and maybe darker or sadder memories while this New one stands for, I guess, not much. HAHA It's up to me to make it mean something, right?

4. This New one said: When I grow up, I will run away and join the circus. The old one said: ICanServe. While the other stood for greater, more nobler causes/goals, this New one simply stood for personal (not necessarily, less) nobler gains. I'm not saying that I will forget the causes of the Old one, it's just that this New band reminds me where my priorities lie (the present) and the things I value (friends, family, loyalty, etc.).

5. All things that the Old one reminded me of, the New one reminds me to put aside for greater things. ;-)
 
 

Friday, May 7, 2010

The Marcel Proust Questionnaire

The Marcel Proust Questionnaire

What is your most marked characteristic?
_RATIONALITY and SENSE (be it common sense, sense of humor etc)

What do you consider your greatest achievement?
_GRADUATING WITH LATIN HONORS FROM UP, and yes, GETTING INTO UP LAW

When and where were you happiest?
_WHENEVER/WHEREVER I'M WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY

What is your greatest regret?
_THINKING TOO MUCH ABOUT WHAT OTHERS MAY SAY

What is your idea of perfect happiness?
_BEING ABLE TO DO WHAT I WANT TO

What is your most treasured possession?
_MY GLASSES, without them I could not see the world clearly

Where would you like to live?
_If not the PHILIPPINES, maybe NETHERLANDS

What is your greatest fear?
_LOSING SOMEONE THAT IS DEAR TO ME

What is the trait you most deplore in yourself?
_TOO MUCH RATIONALITY

What is the trait you most deplore in others?
_IGNORANCE, IRRESPONSIBILITY

Who is/are your hero/es in real life?
_WALA

Who is/are your heroine/s in real life?
_MAMA and ELAINE MENDOZA. Go figure.

Who is/are your hero/es in fiction?
_Does CHUCK BARTOWSKI count? If not, perhaps JOHN COREY, WALTER FANE

Who is/are your heroine/s in fiction?
_SARAH from Sweet November and SYLVIA from Wrong Information is Being Given Out in Princeton by JP Donleavy

What is/are your favorite name/s?
_GABRIEL, HENRY, CARLA, RIA

What do you consider the most overrated virtue?
_HONESTY XD

What is your greatest extravagance?
_BOOKS

What is your favorite journey?
_TO THE UNKNOWN, haha. pero seriously, LIFE :)

What is it that you most dislike?
_HYPOCRISY

What is the quality you most like in a man?
_SENSITIVITY

What is the quality you most like in a woman?
_CERTAINTY

What do you most value in your friends?
_LOYALTY

If you could choose what to come back as, what would it be?
_A WRITER or maybe AN INVISIBLE CREATURE

How would you like to die?
_QUICKLY, NO PAIN IF POSSIBLE



Friday, April 9, 2010

'Twas Fun While It Lasted

Today, It snapped.

Although I was aware of  the frailty and brevity of Its "life," I was still taken aback. Of all places, of all times, of all moments, It chose to snap when I wasn't looking, when I was unaware.

It snapped days after it sinked in me that I wasn't getting any nearer, that I wasn't getting anywhere. This would have been a perfect time, as if God, or someone else who controls the littlest details in this universe, cued for his Angels, or whomever, to cut It to make me realize how fruitless that path was, and I'd have to switch gears soon.

Though I would love to continue Its advocacy, I realize the attachments I gave to It shackled me in a way that made it hard for me to let go. With It around my wrist, I was constantly reminded of all the things I could not achieve, I could not have, and all the things I gave more priority to. It reminded me of weaknesses I could not strengthen, vices I could not avoid, flaws I could not straighten out, desires I could not simply ignore, and memories I could not forget.

Sadly, it reminded me of my personal commitment, obviously one-sided, to all things connected to that past.

Now my wrist is left bare--without that familiar band encircling me, keeping all my emotions in check. It has left a white discoloration on my relatively darker complexion--a constant reminder that It may have snapped and that I had to move on but there's nothing wrong with missing Its presence for in Its existence I experienced a different joy in my heart that never fails to put a smile on my face once remembered, a feeling that I chose, sadly, never to feel again.


The Universal Language

If it's any worth to you, or to anyone, because it is of no use to me... uhh, well, most of the time... I know how to curse in four different languages. And that's not because I Google-Translated cuss words in these languages.

Filipino
English
French
Russian

The most memorable (in a not-so-good but funny way) experience I had with cursing was when I was around 10 or 11 years old. My youngest brother James was annoying me--this has become his natural-born talent--and I just had to do something. So yes, I uttered--no, shouted at him, the words, "Fuck you" as he ran away just as I was asking him to ran an errand for me. My baptism of fire, my red test, so to speak.

Upon hearing the F word come out of my young mouth, what my brilliant mom did was this: she called me back into the house, (The way she said, "Joann pumasok ka nga dito sa loob" gave me the [correct] idea that I was in big trouble.) and asked/ranted about what I said and why I said it. Then, (Surprise! Surpise!) she asked me to get our bulky and dusty Webster's Dictionary--because she knew how I loved that piece of shit--and made me look for the words I just uttered. (Surprise! Surprise!) The word "Fuck" cannot be found anywhere in that heavvyyy peace of shit. Moral lesson, as my mom pointed out, that word was so bad, it meant so bad, that it was not fit to be learned and used by an educated person. Let alone a child of my age.

This experience made me shun the "F" word for the most part of my growing years. In high school though, I opted to use and curse (still) in English rather an in Filipino because it sounds less... vulgar. Words like "shit" and "fuck" and "fudge" became staples in my vocabulary as the years went on. I even used "shit", "oh fuck" and "fucker" more than "oh god" or variations thereof.

But I became inclined to using the Filipino language more because I acquired the belief that it was "so conyo" to use English words as cuss words. So, "gago" and even "puta" slowly became part of my everyday words. Though I still have some reservations for using "putang-ina" or "tang-ina" because I think/believe that the more frequent I use these words, the more times I drag my mom's name (and all other mothers' names) into something bad--shameful, even.

I learned to curse the Russian way (Yeb vas) from Nelson DeMille's book "Lion's Game" (in the book though, "Yob vas" was used). Yeah, one of the many Joys of reading. *wink* These two simple Russian words might come in handy, as Russians are known to be un-hospitable, indifferent and, to some point, rude. I'm ready for you, Klaus, Boris, and Natasha. Ha ha ha

Come senior year in UP, I learned how to curse in French during the very first meeting of French 10. AND I learned to curse in 3 different ways: Va te faire foutre, Va te faire enculer, and Putain. I believe these are very handy phrases/words to know. It is for those Emergency/I-need-a-backup-plan moments when you find yourself in a sticky encounter with the French-speaking population (which is btw, an enormous number) and you feel the need to curse. He he

Still, nothing beats the old but trusty way of getting messages, whether pleasant or hateful, across using the language almost everyone understands... body language. I have yet to use this language though because I find it rather offensive. You see, I'm a visual person.

So, what does this mean? Does my extensive *ehem ehem* knowledge on cuss words and cursing in different languages reflect to a violent, war-freak behavior? I hope not. To be honest, I'm trying not to curse too much and/or just utter these phrases in vain, in pain--or whatever. And to be more perfectly honest, I haven't said the Russian and French versions to any human/living being. Nor have I used, as pointed out, body language towards anyone to convey my message of hate.

Let me be clear that I do not encourage anyone or everyone to curse all they like because I think this is a bad habit I need to shun to be become a real Christian.

I think the knowledge of these words provide me some sort of security (albeit rather shallow or superficial, depending on your views) that in case someone of whatever nationality harasses me or does something I do not like, I can say it straight in their faces, in a language they could understand.

Be it in Filipino, English, French, Russian or plain old "giving (them) the finger."


Saturday, February 13, 2010

One More Reason To Love Saturdays

Just the other day a friend asked me, "Bakit mo love ang Saturdays?" Well, probably he didn't see my other posts. Now, I have one more reason.. Technically, the great news was delivered to me on a Friday (12 February 2010), and I took the exam on a Sunday (22 November 2009).. which makes Saturday in-between those days, but instead of making today, this Saturday in particular (13 February 2010) mediocre, the news only made me love Saturdays even more because today I get to wake up thinking, "Shit, nakapasa ako sa LAE."

Thank you Lord for this great great blessing.

(Well, since I've written a more comprehensive blog in my Multiply account, I'd stop here.)